Shah's warning to the opposition on opposition to removal of 370

Said- come back, otherwise you will not survive as many as you are. On the sixth day (December 11) of the winter session of Parliament, Home Minister Amit Shah introduced two bills related to Jammu and Kashmir in the Rajya Sabha. These included Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill 2023.

Shah's warning to the opposition on opposition to removal of 370
Amit Shah: Minister of Home Affairs of India

During the debate in Rajya Sabha, Amit Shah warned the opposition opposing the removal of Article 370 to come back, otherwise even as many as you are will not survive. In fact, during the debate on the bill throughout the day, the opposition kept blaming the Supreme Court's decision as wrong. The opposition walked out of the Rajya Sabha during Amit Shah's reply on the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) Bill.

Amit Shah said that after the passing of these bills, there will be 43 assembly seats in Jammu instead of 37 and 47 assembly seats in Kashmir instead of 46. Earlier there were a total of 83 seats, now there will be 90.

Ladakh has not been included in this yet. Whereas 24 seats are reserved for PoK, because we consider it a part of India. 9 seats are reserved for SC/ST.

Major points of Amit Shah's statement after the debate

  • Those who say Article 370 is permanent. They are insulting the Constitution and the Constituent Assembly. After the Supreme Court's decision on abrogation of Article 370, the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir has no validity.
  • I have already promised that the statehood of Jammu and Kashmir will be restored at the appropriate time. Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir gave rise to separatism which resulted in promotion of terrorism.
  • The Supreme Court's decision on Jammu and Kashmir is a big defeat for the opposition parties. The decision to remove Section 370 is constitutional. PoK is part of India. No one can snatch even an inch of India's land.
  • Those who raised questions have got the answer. The rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir were restricted by three families and these people were enjoying Article 370.
  • The court has also accepted that imposing President's rule was not a wrong decision. The Supreme Court has rejected the claim of the petitioners.
  • SC held that Article 370 was a temporary provision, there is no doubt about it. If Article 370 was so appropriate and necessary, why would Nehru have used the word temporary before it?
  • There are more Muslims in Bengal and other states than in Jammu and Kashmir, but why is separatism and terrorism more prevalent there?
  • Anyone and no matter how big a person can make a mistake. You people should return otherwise you will not be saved as many as you are.
  • Dhankhar got angry when Periyar was mentioned.
  • During the debate on the bill, there was a heated argument between the BJP and the opposition in the Rajya Sabha. Quoting the controversial statement of EV Ramaswamy Periyar, the father of the Dravidian movement, a DMK MP said that every community has the right to decide its identity.

Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar got angry on this. He said in a strict tone that anti-national statements are not allowed in the House. During the discussion, DMK MP M Abdullah had commented on the Supreme Court's decision on removing Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir.

Congress MP Venugopal protested when the MP was stopped. After this there was an uproar. Then the Chairman asked M Abdullah to complete his statement. Abdullah mentioned Periyar's statement in his speech.

Periyar had advocated a separate country, Dravida Nadu, in South India. Abdullah said that this also applies to the people of Kashmir. Chairman Dhankhar did not consider this right. It was also removed from the records of the House.

Dhankhar said- MPs were taking oxygen from this statement. After this, MP Tiruchi Siva said in support of DMK MP M Abdullah that what is wrong in quoting Periyar.

Demonstration at Jharkhand MP's place after getting Rs 300 crore
Earlier, party MPs including BJP national president JP Nadda demonstrated with placards in the Parliament complex. In this, protest was expressed against finding Rs 300 crore cash in the house of Jharkhand Congress MP Dheeraj Sahu.

The session will continue till 22 December
The winter session of Parliament started from December 4, which will continue till December 22. A total of 15 meetings are to be held in this winter session, out of which 5 have taken place. There were uproar on many issues in the first 5 meetings of this session, which started after the election results of four states. On December 6, a meeting of MPs of INDIA alliance was also held, in which the opposition's strategy for Parliament was discussed.

Read the last 5 proceedings of the winter session of Parliament sequentially

Proceedings of the first day - PM Modi said - do not vent your anger over the defeat in the House.
The winter session of Parliament began on Monday 4 December. As soon as PM Narendra Modi reached the Lok Sabha, NDA MPs gave him a warm welcome. Before the beginning of the session, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had told the opposition - do not vent out the anger of the defeat outside in the House.

Proceedings of the second day - Uproar over DMK leader's statement regarding cow urine status.
On the second day (December 5), Home Minister Amit Shah had introduced the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha. During the discussion, DMK MP from Dharmapuri, Dr. Senthil Kumar had said that BJP's strength lies only in winning those states of Hindi belt, which we generally call cow urine states. After the uproar increased, this statement was removed from the record.

Proceedings of the third day- Shah read Nehru's letter in the Lok Sabha
On the third day (6 December) the Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (Amendment) Bill and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization (Amendment) Bill were passed in the Lok Sabha. During the discussion in the House, Amit Shah had quoted Jawaharlal Nehru. The Home Minister said- 'Nehru had written to Sheikh Abdullah that it was a mistake to take the Kashmir issue to the UN.'

Proceedings of the fourth day- BJP's Ramesh Bidhuri apologized; Dhankhar expressed grief in Rajya Sabha
On the fourth day (7 December), the Central University Amendment Bill 2023 was passed in the Lok Sabha. Meanwhile, BJP MP Ramesh Bidhuri had apologized to the parliamentary committee. During the special session, Bidhuri had made derogatory remarks on SP MP Danish Ali. On the other hand, Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar had expressed grief over the viral video.

Proceedings of the fifth day- Mahua expelled from Lok Sabha

On the fifth day of Parliament, a 500-page report of the Ethics Committee was presented accusing Mahua Moitra of asking questions for taking money. In which a recommendation was made to cancel Mahua's Parliament membership and a demand for legal investigation. TMC had demanded that 48 hours be given to read the 500-page report. After this the House was adjourned.

There was uproar over this in the Lok Sabha thrice. The proceedings were adjourned twice. When the proceedings started for the third time at 2 pm, voting was held on Mahua's expulsion, after which the proposal to expel him was passed. As soon as voting started in the House, the opposition boycotted it.